Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Protests in Myanmar

This is my first time learning extensive information about the protests occurring in Myanmar, formerly known as Burma. These protests began due to the price of fuel that was significantly increased by the government. The government intimidated
Protestors and then the Buddhist monks became involved.

The latest march by the monks occurred in the central town of Pakokku, 370 miles from Yangon. This crackdown stifled anger at 45 years of military rule and poverty that deepened.

(Information found through MSNBC)

On August 19 2008, in Myanmar, there were 400,000 military men and monks from poorer families. In Myanmar and other Buddhist nations, many joined the monks in protest against the rising costs of transportation and basic goods. After a fuel price increase, the price of transportation and goods were increased. The monks retained ultimate moral authority.

(Information found through the New York Times)

The Sangha (also known as the Buddhist hierarchy and spiritual status of the monks) are of utmost importance. All leaders have adhered to the Buddhist pratices. Over the years, the junta (also known as the military or political group that rules a country after taking power by force) worked to co-opt the Buddhist hierarchy. They placed chosen men in key positions angering and alienating younger monks.

My personal opinion about the protests is the monks in Myanmar are fairly standing up for their rights with just cause. Due to high fuel and food prices, they have reason to be frustrated with their current situations.

Other causes for tension and frustrations may be attributed to the fact that only one percent of the people of Myanmar are educated. There is political repression, religious tension, and very little national unity. The poor economic policies have led to a retardation of economic development. The Burmese state has very little control over their economy. Their economy is made up of mostly rice agriculture, and is in British, Indian, and Chinese hands.

No comments: